Pain → product mapping
Every extracted pain ranked against your catalog, confidence-scored. Three upsells queued before the AE has ended the call.
Every call your team runs becomes structured, cited, queryable context, mapped to your product catalog and tied to the rep who heard it. The new AE inherits a Day-1 brief. The CS director picks up mid-story. Nothing is re-asked.
“Handoff loses context every time an AE rotates off.”
“Pains repeat across accounts — all in reps’ heads.”
“CRM has notes, not anything we can query.”
Every extracted pain ranked against your catalog, confidence-scored. Three upsells queued before the AE has ended the call.
Call A: “budget is fifty.” Call B: “budget’s tight.” Salency flags it with both citations before the rep re-pitches the wrong number.
One-click markdown. The new AE gets a brief. The CS director gets a handoff. Nobody gets “I wasn’t in that call.”
Stages, quotas, forecasts. What the deal is.
Transcript, summary, coaching snippets. What was said.
Pains, product matches, contradictions, stakeholder graph. What it means, across every call.
| Signal | In your CRM | In Salency |
|---|---|---|
| Customer pain | Free-text field, last writer wins | Cited quote, speaker, timestamp — ranked by urgency |
| Contradiction between calls | Invisible — fields overwrite silently | Flagged with both source citations |
| Pain → product fit | One value per field, no ranking | Confidence-ranked, top-N per pain |
| Pattern across accounts | CSV export to a spreadsheet | Search “handoff loses context” — 7 accounts match |
Flatten the graph and you kill the thing. Read the full thesis →
First account memory stands up in a week. By month two, the rep inheriting it reads the story, not a notes field.